In Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978, the Supreme Court ruled that
|
Show
Overview
"Race or ethnic background may be deemed a ‘plus’ in a particular applicant’s file, yet it does not insulate the individual from comparison with all other candidates for the available seats." This case explores the legal concept of equal protection. In the early 1970s, the University of California Davis School of Medicine devised a dual admissions program to increase representation of racial minorities and “disadvantaged” students. Allan Bakke, a White person, applied to and was rejected from the regular admissions program. Applicants of color with lower grade point averages and test scores were admitted under the specialty admissions program. Bakke filed suit, alleging that the dual admissions system violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and excluded him on the basis of race. The Supreme Court found for Bakke against the rigid use of racial quotas, but also established that race was a permissible criterion among several others. For TeachersThis section is for teachers.Use the links below to access:
(Learn more about Street Law's commitment and approach to quality curriculum.) About the Case
Learning ActivitiesThe Case
After the Case
Teacher ResourcesTeaching Strategies Used
Landmark Cases GlossaryThe LandmarkCases.org glossary compiles all of the important vocab terms from case materials. It is provided as a view-only Google Sheet. Glossary Planning Time and ActivitiesIf you have one day . . .
If you have two days . . .
If you have three days . . .
If you have four days . . .
Return to Case Listing What did the Supreme Court say in its ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978 )? Quizlet?In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.
What was the Court's decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke quizlet?In Regents of University of California v. Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances. You just studied 8 terms!
What did the Supreme Court decide in the case of Regents of the University of California?Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
What was the impact of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke?Justice Lewis Powell's ruling in the 1978 case Regents v. Bakke buoyed affirmative action—but in the process, it transformed how colleges think about race and equality in admissions. Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell was on the fence in 1978.
|
