Paper under review for 1 month

The practice of peer review is to ensure that good social science is published. It is a process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable journals. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of Social Science & Medicine and manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.
Special Issues have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors and/or Advisory Editors. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office.

Initial manuscript evaluation
All new submissions are screened for completeness and adherence to the Guide for Authors. Those that pass are then assigned to a Senior Editor for consideration for sending for peer review. Authors of manuscripts rejected at initial evaluation stage will normally be informed within 1 week of receipt.

Senior Editor evaluation
When assigned a new submission, the Senior Editor will decide if it warrants peer review or if it should be rejected without review. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious conceptual and/or methodological flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal.

Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will normally be informed within 10 days of assignment to the senior editor.

Feedback is provided by the Senior Editor for all manuscripts rejected without review and, where possible, suggestions are made on other suitable publication outlets.

Those manuscripts deemed suitable for peer review are passed to at least 2 expert referees for review.

Type of peer review
Social Science & Medicine employs double-blind review, where both the referee and the author remain anonymous throughout the process.

How the reviewers are selected
Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise, and our referee database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for reviewers from authors, though these recommendations may or may not be used.

Reviewer reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate a manuscript for:

  • originality and significance of contribution
  • interest to social scientists and/or practitioners
  • international relevance
  • coverage of appropriate existing literature
  • adequacy of methodology, analysis and interpretation
  • clear, concise and jargon-free writing style
  • organisation

Reviewers are asked to provide anonymous comments to the author and are also given the option of providing confidential comments to the editor. The comments to the author are also made available to other reviewers of the manuscript.

Reviewers are not expected to correct or copy edit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

How long does the review process take?
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 80 days. Should the reviewers' reports contradict one another or a report is unduly delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. If necessary, revised manuscripts may be returned to the initial reviewers, usually within 1 month. Reviewers and Senior Editors may request more than one revision of a manuscript, and alternative reviewers may also be invited to review the manuscript at any time.

The final decision and time to publication
The Senior Editor is responsible for the decision to reject or recommend the manuscript for publication. This decision will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees.

Please note we may forward accepted papers for legal review if appropriate.

After acceptance, it currently takes 1 week to get a citable, uncorrected draft of the article online, another 4-5 weeks to get the final corrected article online, and a few weeks later this is compiled into an online volume and issue. The print copy follows 2-3 weeks later.

Becoming a referee for Social Science & Medicine
IIf you are not currently a referee for Social Science & Medicine but would like to be added to our referee database, please visit //www.editorialmanager.com/ssm/ and register your details. The benefits of refereeing for Social Science & Medicine include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in an annual statement in the journal. You may also be able to cite your work for Social Science & Medicine as part of your professional development requirements for various professional societies and organisations.

None

Quaid-i-Azam University

Ain Shams University

None

PMAS - Arid Agriculture University

Kwame Nkrumah University Of Science and Technology

Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir

Quaid-i-Azam University

Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission

Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology

University of Namibia

Government of West Bengal

University of Basrah

Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University

Quaid-i-Azam University

Punjab Agricultural University

CCS Haryana Agricultural University

Quaid-i-Azam University

Bells University of Technology

Punjab Agricultural University

Banaras Hindu University

Quaid-i-Azam University

Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Tribhuvan University

Amol Specilized University of Modern Technologies

Agriculture and Forestry University

Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue

Amol Specilized University of Modern Technologies

Quaid-i-Azam University

Arak University

Punjab Agricultural University

Quaid-i-Azam University

University of Copenhagen

Quaid-i-Azam University

Quaid-i-Azam University

Islamic Azad University Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch

Punjab Agricultural University

University of Namibia

Quaid-i-Azam University

Olutosin Ademola Otekunrin

University of Agriculture, Abeokuta

Lovely Professional University

University of Ibadan

University of Ibadan

University of Ibadan

Quaid-i-Azam University

Quaid-i-Azam University

Amol Specilized University of Modern Technologies

David A. Martínez Vásquez

National University of Colombia

IMPS college of Engineering and Technology

International Islamic University Chittagong

Page 2

Video liên quan

Chủ Đề