What was the spoils system and how did patronage affect how government functions?

The “spoils system” describes when a candidate wins election and then rewards campaign staffers and fundraisers by appointing them to prized jobs in the administration.

This practice is sometimes also called the patronage system.

The spoils system has likely existed, in one form or another, for as long as government itself. However, it is closely associated with 19th century politics, and it likely began to flourish during Andrew Jackson’s administration.

Andrew Jackson introduced a system of rotation in office, under which government jobs were regularly rotated among party members. In theory, this system would create an egalitarian system, in which no one person was allowed to dominate any particular office. Jackson argued that government offices did not require specialized training, and should not be turned into a bureaucracy dominated by a class of civil servants.

In practice, Jackson’s administration was not as democratic as he had hoped. Although the president did introduce many new people into government office, most public jobs were still held by wealthy elites.

The phrase “spoils system” was also made famous in the early 19th century. William Learned Marcy, who served in the U.S. Senate and eventually as governor of Massachusetts, was famous for using the phrase.

When Martin Van Buren was nominated to serve as ambassador to England, Van Buren was criticized for allegedly practicing the “spoils system.” Marcy, defending Van Burean, said that there was nothing wrong with a system in which “to the victor belong the spoils of the enemy.”

Of course, Jackson was not the only president to closely supervise appointments to civil service jobs.

The White House notes that Chester A. Arthur was another fan of the spoils system:

Honorable in his personal life and his public career, Arthur nevertheless was a firm believer in the spoils system when it was coming under vehement attack from reformers. He insisted upon honest administration of the Customs House, but staffed it with more employees than it needed, retaining them for their merit as party workers rather than as Government officials.

Today, the spoils system has been replaced by the Federal merit system. The merit system is outlined in a House document entitled Our American Government, and reads in part:

The Federal merit system was established to ensure that any personnel actions, such as hiring, promotion, demotion, or firing, are taken on the basis of an individual’s ability and performance. It replaced the ‘‘spoils system’’ whereby political patronage con[1]trolled hiring and firing practices.

By contrast, the merit system is designed to ensure that the best candidates are hired for Federal positions, that they will be treated fairly, and that they will have the opportunity to rise as far as their abilities take them. Important merit system principles include the selection and advancement for Federal positions on the basis of knowledge, ability and skills, under fair and open competition; and personnel management conducted without regard to politics, race, color, religion, national ori[1]gin, sex, marital status, age or handicapping condition.

Briefly, this means that most government jobs are considered non-political and the people who hold these jobs may not be replaced for political reasons. Post office workers, government clerks, and other employees who work in non-political civil service posts are to be hired based on their abilities, not on membership in a political party.

Theories of Spoils System from Mhd Faheem Aliuden

"The Spoils System" was the name given to the practice of hiring and firing federal workers when presidential administrations changed in the 19th century. It is also known as the patronage system.

The practice began during the administration of President Andrew Jackson, who took office in March 1829. Jackson supporters portrayed it as a necessary and overdue effort at reforming the federal government.

Jackson's political opponents had a very different interpretation, as they considered his method to be a corrupt use of political patronage. And the term Spoils System was intended to be a derogatory nickname.

The phrase came from a speech by Senator William L. Marcy of New York. While defending the actions of the Jackson administration in a speech in the U.S. Senate, Marcy famously said, "to the victor belong the spoils."

Intended as a Reform Under Jackson

When Andrew Jackson took office in March 1829, after the bruising election of 1828, he was determined to change the way the federal government operated. And, as might be expected, he ran into considerable opposition.

Jackson was by nature very suspicious of his political opponents. As he took office he was still quite angry at his predecessor, John Quincy Adams. The way Jackson saw things, the federal government was full of people who were opposed to him.

When Jackson felt that some of his initiatives were being blocked, he became incensed. His solution was to come up with an official program to remove people from federal jobs and replace them with employees considered loyal to his administration.

Other administrations going back to that of George Washington had hired loyalists, of course, but under Jackson, the purging of people thought to be political opponents became official policy.

To Jackson and his supporters, it was a welcome change. Stories were circulated claiming that elderly men who were no longer able to perform their jobs were still filling positions to which they had been appointed by George Washington nearly 40 years earlier.

Spoils System Denounced as Corruption

Jackson's policy of replacing federal employees was bitterly denounced by his political opponents. But they were essentially powerless to fight against it.

Jackson's political ally (and future president) Martin Van Buren was at times credited with having created the new policy, as his New York political machine, known as the Albany Regency, had operated in a similar fashion.

Published reports in the 19th century claimed that Jackson's policy accounted for nearly 700 government officers losing their jobs in 1829, the first year of his presidency. In July 1829, a newspaper report claiming the mass firings of federal employees actually affected the economy of the city of Washington, with merchants unable to sell goods.

That may have been exaggerated, but there is no doubt that Jackson's policy was controversial.

In January 1832 Jackson's perennial enemy, Henry Clay, became involved. He assailed Senator Marcy of New York in a Senate debate, accusing the loyal Jacksonian of bringing corrupt practices from the New York political machine to Washington.

In his exasperated retort to Clay, Marcy defended the Albany Regency, declaring: "They see nothing wrong in the rule that to the victor belong the spoils."

The phrase was widely quoted, and it became notorious. Jackson's opponents cited it often as an example of blatant corruption that rewarded political supporters with federal jobs.

Spoils System Reformed in the 1880s

Presidents who took office after Jackson all followed the practice of doling out federal jobs to political supporters. There are many stories, for instance, of President Abraham Lincoln, at the height of the Civil War, being endlessly annoyed by officer-seekers who would come to the White House to plead for jobs.

The Spoils System was criticized for decades, but what ultimately led to its reform was a shockingly violent act in the summer of 1881, the shooting of President James Garfield by a disappointed and deranged office seeker. Garfield died on September 19, 1881, 11 weeks after being shot by Charles Guiteau at a Washington, D.C. train station.

The shooting of President Garfield helped inspire the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, which created civil servants, federal workers who were not hired or fired as a result of politics.

The Man Who Coined the Phrase

Senator Marcy of New York, whose retort to Henry Clay gave the Spoils System its name, was unfairly vilified, according to his political supporters. Marcy did not intend his comment to be an arrogant defense of corrupt practices, which is how it has often been portrayed.

Incidentally, Marcy had been a hero in the War of 1812 and served as governor of New York for 12 years after briefly serving in the U.S. Senate. He later served as the secretary of war under President James K. Polk. Marcy later helped negotiate the Gadsden Purchase while serving as secretary of state under President Franklin Pierce. Mount Marcy, the highest point in New York State, is named for him.

Yet, despite a long and distinguished government career, William Marcy is best remembered for inadvertently giving the Spoils System its notorious name.

Cite this Article

Format

mla apa chicago

Your Citation

McNamara, Robert. "The Spoils System: Definition and Summary." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/the-spoils-system-1773347 (accessed November 30, 2022).

What was the effect of the spoil system?

As a result, the spoils system allowed those with political influence to ascend to powerful positions within the government, regardless of their level of experience or skill, thus compounding both the inefficiency of government as well as enhancing the opportunities for corruption.

What was the spoils system and how did it change?

Under the spoils system, Jackson replaced many upstanding civil service agents--approximately 10% of federally appointed positions--with his own friends and supporters, many of whom brought incompetence to their posts.

What is the spoils system and how does it benefit the president?

The spoils system was instituted by Democratic President Andrew Jackson. "To the victor goes the spoils" meant that every government job belonged to the party in power. This drawing was meant to depict Jackson's decision-making in appointing members of his party to government positions.

What was the spoils system quizlet?

What is a spoils system? A practice in which a political party, after winning an election gives government civil service jobs to its supporters as a repayment for supporting them and as inventive to continue to do so.