Which option best characterizes the difference between act and rule utilitarianism?
|
According to Kant, what is the main problem with the golden rule? Show
b. It makes morality depend solely on the consequences of one's actions. c. It fails to give us any guidance whatsoever. d. It allows lying, which is never permissible. What does Kant mean by a maxim?
b. An objective moral law. c. A misleading moral command. d. A principle of action that one gives to oneself. What is the fundamental principle of morality, according to Kant?
b. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. c. Act only on maxims that are universalizable. d. Always maximize happiness. Which of the following best characterizes Kant's moral theory?
b. It is a version of consequentialism, but it is not utilitarian. c. It is neutral on the issue of whether consequentialism is true. d. It is inconsistent with consequentialism. What did Kant believe is the relationship between rationality and morality?
b. Rationality requires us to be moral. c. Morality and rationality are completely independent. d. Rationality might sometimes require immorality but not often. What is a categorical imperative, according to Kant?
b. A command of reason that does not depend on our desires. c. A principle of action that one gives to oneself. d. A principle of action that one gives to others. What is a hypothetical imperative, according to Kant?
b. A command of reason that does not depend on our desires. c. A principle of action that one gives to oneself. d. A principle of action that one gives to others. Which of the following did Kant believe to be the central moral virtue?
b. Benevolence. c. Compassion. d. None of the above. When did Kant believe that it is permissible to lie?
b. Whenever doing so is necessary to avoid a catastrophe. c. Whenever the subject matter is insignificant. d. Never. According to the text, what is wrong with the principle of universalizability?
b. It permits the actions of principled fanatics. c. It falsely claims that the central moral virtue is benevolence. d. It makes the morality of actions solely a matter of their consequences. journal article Rules and UtilitarianismAmerican Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 1, No. 1 (Jan., 1964) , pp. 32-44 (13 pages) Published By: University of Illinois Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009117 Journal Information Over the years, the APQ has established itself as one of the principal English vehicles for the publication of scholarly work in philosophy. The whole of each issue—printed in a large page, double-column format— is devoted to articles; there are no discussion pieces, book reviews, or critical notices. The editorial policy is to publish substantial work of high quality, regardless of the school of thought from which it derives. The Journal is published four times a year, in January, April, July, and October. Publisher Information The University of Illinois Press is one of the leading publishers of humanities and social sciences journals in the country. Founded in 1918, the Press publishes more than 40 journals representing 18 societies, along with more than 100 new books annually. Our publication program covers a wide range of disciplines including psychology, philosophy, Black studies, women's studies, cultural studies, music, immigration, and more. Current issues are available through the Scholarly Publishing Collective. The Press is a founding member of the Association of University Presses. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. What is the difference between rule and act utilitarianism?There is a difference between rule and act utilitarianism. The act utilitarian considers only the results or consequences of the single act while the rule utilitarian considers the consequences that result of following a rule of conduct .
Which option best characterizes the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism?-Rule utilitarianism supports general moral rules and practices (such as the practice of promises) that would promote utility. This contrasts with act utilitarianism's focus on individual acts. The right act for act utilitarianism also depends on the particular situation; for rule utilitarianism, rule hold in general.
What is the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism example?A key point in this article concerns the distinction between individual actions and types of actions. Act utilitarians focus on the effects of individual actions (such as John Wilkes Booth's assassination of Abraham Lincoln) while rule utilitarians focus on the effects of types of actions (such as killing or stealing).
What is the difference between act and rule utilitarianism quizlet?Act utilitarianism beliefs that an action becomes morally right when it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people, while Rule utilitarianism beliefs that the moral correctness of an action depends on the correctness of the rules that allows it to achieve the greatest good. You just studied 4 terms!
|
