So sánh ryzen 3700x vs i7 9700k

Comparing Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingPlace by popularityno dataValue for money21.9853.74Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processorSeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 7Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Release date8 October 2018 (5 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)Launch price (MSRP)$374$329Current price$243 (0.6x MSRP)$205 (0.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 3700X has 144% better value for money than i7-9700K.

Technical specs

Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)Threads816Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHzBoost clock speed4.9 GHz4.4 GHzL1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)L3 cache12 MB (shared)32 MBChip lithography14 nm7 nmDie size178 mm2no dataMaximum core temperature100 °Cno dataMaximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno dataNumber of transistorsno data19,200 million64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility++Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)SocketLGA-1151AM4Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no dataAES-NI++AVX++vPro+no dataEnhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no dataEnhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no dataTurbo Boost Technology2.0no dataHyper-Threading Technology+no dataTSX+no dataTSX+no dataIdle States+no dataThermal Monitoring+no dataSIPP+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no dataEDB+no dataSecure Key+no dataMPX+no dataIdentity Protection+no dataSGXYes with Intel® MEno dataOS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++VT-d+no dataVT-x+no dataEPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channelMaximum memory size128 GB128 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s51.196 GB/sECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630-Max video memory64 GB-Quick Sync Video+-Clear Video+-Clear Video HD+-Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz-InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz-Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz-Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X.

PCIe version3.0no dataPCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3700X 14.71

+55.8%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 56% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 3700X 22616

+55.8%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 56% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Core i7-9700K outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Ryzen 7 3700X 8086

+14.1%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core i7-9700K outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 31% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core i7-9700K outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 6% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 3700X 13815

+6.9%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 7% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core i7-9700K outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 21% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 46% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 3700X 2092

+44.4%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 44% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Core i7-9700K outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 1% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Core i7-9700K outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 3700X 11.4

+40.7%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 41% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 1% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-9700K by 21% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 9.44 14.71 Recency 8 October 2018 27 May 2019 Cost $374 $329 Boost clock speed 4900 4400 Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 3700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700K in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Core i7-9700K

Ryzen 7 3700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate Intel Core i7-9700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700K or Ryzen 7 3700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.